Showing posts with label Thoughts on Oscar Nominations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thoughts on Oscar Nominations. Show all posts

Eclipse All Yours Music Video from Metric Three More Awesome Eclipse Movie Stills

Are you a Twihard living in a major city? Well, if you’re checking out The Twilight Saga: Eclipse this weekend, there’s a chance one of the film’s stars could be catching it with you thanks to Summit Entertainment s effort to have the cast “show their appreciation for their fans, and thanking them for all of the excitement, enthusiasm and support they have shown.”
Now is this a fantastic way to market a film or what? It’s likely that all of the diehard fans have already seen the film, so what better way to lure them in for another round than by creating the potential that one of their idols could be at the screening? Even more than a mere marketing ploy, the whole concept is just, well, nice. This may just be another film for the studio and actors, but there are tons of people out there who really take the series to heart. Even a glimpse of one of the stars of the film could make their day.
Source:shockya
Sponsor:Click2.info

'Crazy Heart' gets Oscar boost

"Crazy Heart" may not have received one of the Academy Awards' 10 best picture slots, but it got its revenge at the box office this weekend.

Fox Searchlight's country-music drama, which received three nominations, including best actor for Jeff Bridges, went from 239 locations to 819 this weekend and collected a studio-estimated $3.65 million, or $4,457 per theater.

That's the best performance by far of any Oscar-nominated picture that expanded into more theaters this weekend.

"Crazy Heart" did particularly well in Florida, said Fox Searchlight's executive vice president of distribution, Sheila Deloach, a sign that older audiences are taking to the tale of a past-his-prime country singer.

Several best picture nominees moved into more theaters as well but with less impressive results.

Sony Pictures Classics expanded "An Education" from 75 theaters to 761 and generated $915,407, or a relatively soft $1,203 per theater. Its total so far is $9.8 million.

Lionsgate had hoped to build on the $45.6 million that "Precious" made through Thursday primarily from African American moviegoers by taking the dark but inspiring drama from 222 theaters to 669 and reaching a more diverse audience. But the best picture nominee sold a weak $440,000 worth of tickets, or $650 per theater.

Summit Entertainment expanded "The Hurt Locker" from 38 theaters to 110.

The Iraq war drama, undoubtedly slowed by already being available on DVD, took in just $123,000, or $1,118 per location. Despite its status as the presumed top contender for best picture alongside "Avatar," it has sold just $13.4 million of tickets domestically.

Sony Classics' "The Last Station," which got two acting nominations, went from nine theaters to 51 and took in a healthy $371,064, or $7,226 per theater. Its total domestic gross is now $758,531.

Source:latimes.com

Box Office: AVATAR, New Releases, Oscar Movies

According to estimates provided by Box Office Mojo, Lasse Hallström’s romantic tearjerker Dear John, starring Channing Tatum and Amanda Seyfried, topped the domestic box-office this weekend, with $32.4 million in ticket sales. Avatar came at a distance second, with $23.6 million. James Cameron’s 3D sci-fier has grossed a total of $630 million after 52 days.

The $52 million John Travolta-Jonathan Rhys Meyers vehicle From Paris with Love earned a paltry $8.1 million ($2,983 per screen) on its opening weekend. Following in fourth place was Mel Gibson’s Edge of Darkness with $7 million, a 59.3 percent drop from the previous weekend. The $80 million revenge thriller has earned a very disappointing $29m after ten days.

At #5, Dwayne Johnson’s The Tooth Fairy, co-starring Julie Andrews, had a — relatively speaking — surprisingly low attendance drop rate from last weekend: 35 percent. The fantasy comedy earned $6.5m for a total of $34 million after two and a half weeks.

The Kristen Bell-Josh Duhamel romantic comedy When in Rome was #6 with $5.5m, a 55.4 percent drop from last week, followed by Denzel Washington’s post-apocalyptic drama The Book of Eli with $4.8m (45.7 percent drop). Jeff Bridges‘ Crazy Heart, now playing at 813 theaters, was #8 with $3.6m, a good $4,457 per screen. Legion was next with $3.4m and $34.6 million to date.

Rounding out the top twelve were Robert Downey Jr’s Sherlock Holmes ($2.63m), Sandra Bullock’s The Blind Side ($2.6m), and George Clooney’s Up in the Air ($2.35m).



The Oscar nominations announcement coupled with an increase in number of screens helped movies as diverse as Crazy Heart (580 more screens, a 58.1 percent increase), Carey Mulligan’s An Education (above, 915K at 686 more screens, a 668 percent increase), Colin Firth’s A Single Man ($631K at 137 more screens, a 14 percent increase), Gabourey Sidibe’s Precious ($440K at 447 more screens, a 104 percent increase), Helen Mirren’s The Last Station ($371K at 42 more screens, a 337 percent increase), and Michael Haneke’s The White Ribbon ($132K at 4 more screens, a 12.9 percent increase).

Up in the Air is playing at 117 more screens than last week. Even so, the comedy-drama dropped 16.7 percent; a relatively small reduction, but a reduction nevertheless. The Blind Side lost 11 screens and had a small 13.9 percent drop.

The Oscars seem to have made little — if any — difference to the weekend’s box-office performance of Avatar, The Princess and the Frog, Sherlock Holmes, The Lovely Bones, or Nine.

Photos: Dear John (Scott Garfield / Dear John, LLC); From Paris with Love (Nico Torres / Lionsgate); An Education (Kerry Brown / Sony Pictures Classics)


Source:altfg.com/

A Few Random Thoughts on the 2010 Oscar Nominations

A Few Random Thoughts on the 2010 Oscar Nominations
First posted Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

The 82nd Academy Award nominations have been announced, with Disney/Pixar's Up getting a nod for Best Picture in addition to the expected Best Animated Feature nomination. I have to admit that as much as I liked the movie, I don't think it's the one I would have picked among Pixar's total output to get the nod for Best Picture. However, it was a pretty good if not great year for movies, it seems, and to paraphrase the parable about life on the African veldt, the Best Picture of the year only has to be better than all the other movies released in the same year, not the Best Picture ever.

In any event, I think the question of whether Up will become the first animated feature to win the Best Picture Oscar is moot once you look at its competition. The good news about animation being seated at the big kids' table is that it's another acknowledgment, however small, that animation is a serious medium capable of making great art and not just the kiddie stuff that a good portion of America (or at least a good portion of Hollywood) seems to think it is. The bad news is that this year's animated film has to stand toe-to-toe with the work of Quentin Tarantino and the Coen Brothers, as well as with the very highly acclaimed The Hurt Locker, Up in the Air, and Precious. This would be tough competition for any movie, regardless of medium, and to be honest I'd eliminate District 9 and Avatar as possible winners in this category as well. Science fiction and fantasy fare about as well as comedies in the Best Picture race, with barely a dozen movies from those genres getting nominated in the past 40 years and only The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King's winning in 2003.

Avatar also happens to sit right in the crux of a few different issues I've been grappling with for the News. As our readers will have noticed, the headlines Avatar has been grabbing in the mainstream press are not reflected on our News Ticker. Like King Kong, the later Pirates of the Caribbean movies, and modern video games in general, I think Avatar uses similar techniques to more traditionally animated features, but that doesn't make it an animated movie in my view. At best, I'd call Avatar a hybrid film (at least from the clips I've seen -- I have not watched the movie and judging by the movie's phenomenal box office success, I may be the only person who was never that interested in it). I don't think many people would call Who Framed Roger Rabbit? or Mary Poppins "animated" movies, either, despite their heavy reliance on animation. In this, I'm afraid I break with our friends over at Cartoon Brew, who are congratulating Avatar for being the second animated movie in the Best Picture race. In any event, Cameron himself insists that Avatar is not animation, with an attitude that I think is merely another variation on the, "Cartoons are just for kids" mentality, so I'm happy to lock him out of the clubhouse. He will just have to find solace from my peevish snit in the billions of dollars he's made on the movie so far.

The second issue that Avatar brings up relates to the lack of recognition of actors in animation. Cameron himself has complained over perceived snubs at the acting of his Avatar performers in the SAG awards, and the movie's acting was bypassed by year's Oscars as well. I would point out the notable absence of acting award nominations for Cameron's films in general and humbly suggest that perhaps the technology is not to blame for the snubbing of the acting in Avatar, but he can gripe much more loudly about a point that animation fans have felt for some time: voice actors are routinely treated as second-class citizens to their on-camera equivalents. The shoddy treatment of the cast of Space Jam at the movie's premiere is a visible example, as is Cameron's own brusque dismissal of Meryl Streep's performance in Fantastic Mr. Fox. There is also the issue that the animators themselves are as responsible for the "acting" of a character as the voice actors, which begs the question of who exactly should get the credit for a particularly good performance. I would like to see wider recognition of a good performance in animation, but I must admit I don't really know how to get there. However, such nuances are probably well beyond the Academy members, and this is why we have the Annie Awards anyway.

I don't have any serious complaints about the nominees for Best Animated Feature. I think it was a very good year for animated movies in general, and I think swapping in a different movie released last year would shortchange one of the other nominees. I can say little or nothing meaningful about the Best Animated Short category.

In any event, no ruminations on the Oscars would be complete without predictions, although I openly admit mine are blissfully unencumbered by any biases that might arise from actually seeing many of the movies nominated. But hey, I'm just a guy on the Internet exercising his right to spout off about things he knows nothing about. As I mentioned, I don't think Up has even a long-shot chance at winning the Best Picture Oscar. Unfortunately, it will probably have to settle for the honor of being nominated, because I also suspect that Fantastic Mr. Fox will be the winner for the Best Animated Feature due to the Academy's general adoration for the works of Wes Anderson. It would be something of a shame if Pete Docter walked away from the ceremonies empty-handed, especially since I still believe he was robbed of an Oscar in 2003, but it looks like it might happen again this year. At least he won't be losing out to such a vastly inferior movie like Shrek. I don't hold out hope that the Academy will recognize the movie in the Best Original Screenplay category. This marks the 6th time an animated movie has been nominated for a writing Oscar (the other 5 being Toy Story, Shrek, Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, and WALL-E; the number goes to 6 if you want to call Mary Poppins animated), but none of them have ever won and again, Up faces some very stiff competition.

In any event, I would still like to congratulate all the nominees and wish them the best of luck. We'll see you all on Oscar night.

Source:toonzone.net/
 
sagolas-world tattoo